ABORDAGENS MINIMAMENTE INVASIVAS EM CIRURGIA ONCOLÓGICA: IMPACTO NA RECUPERAÇÃO DO PACIENTE E TAXAS DE SOBREVIVÊNCIA

Authors

  • Maria Clara Pereira Prado Nunes UNINOVAFAPI
  • Fabrícia Santos Silva Estacio de Sá - Alagoinhas BA
  • Luana Moura Luz Fé Centro Universitário UniFacid Wyden
  • Adoaldo Fernandes Gomes Neto Centro Universitário UniFacid Wyden
  • Isabela Castelo Guimarães UFMA
  • Maria Laura Vasconcelos Moreira Lopes de Goes Universidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas
  • Arthur Pereira Miranda Universidade Estadual de Ciências da Saúde de Alagoas
  • João Victor Vasconcelos Tavares Maximiliano Universidade Federal de Alagoas
  • Maria Fernanda Rodrigues Gomes Universidade Federal de Alagoas
  • Luanar Freire Torres Universidade Federal de Alagoas
  • Júlio César Soares Barros Universidade Federal de Alagoas
  • Antonia Cardoso Silva Universidade Federal de Alagoas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36557/pbpc.v3i2.231

Keywords:

Oncological Surgery, Treatment, Management, Innovations.

Abstract

Introduction: In recent decades, oncological surgery has evolved significantly, with an increasing emphasis on minimally invasive techniques. These approaches, including laparoscopic surgery, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), and, more recently, robotic surgery, have been performed to reduce surgical trauma, speed recovery, and improve the quality of life of cancer patients.

Methodology: The methodology of this integrative review was designed to provide a comprehensive analysis of minimally invasive approaches in oncologic surgery, focusing on the impact of these techniques on patient recovery and survival rates. One review included studies covering a variety of cancers, including colorectal, prostate, lung and other cancers, that were treated with minimally invasive approaches.

Results: The results of the integrative review indicate that minimally invasive approaches, such as laparoscopy and robotic surgery, have positive impacts on patient recovery and survival rates for various types of cancer. Compared to traditional open surgery, patients undergoing CMIs generally experience less postoperative pain, fewer complications, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery.

Conclusion: Minimally invasive techniques represent a significant advance in oncological surgery, with the potential to improve patient outcomes.

 

References

ATALLAH S, et al. Natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Br J Surg, 2015; 102(2): e73-92.

BAPAYE A, et al. Single-session endoscopic fundoplication after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM+F) for prevention of post gastroesophageal reflux - 1-year follow-up study. Endoscopy, 2021; 53(11): 1114-1121.

BRINCAT SD, et al. Natural orifice versus transabdominal specimen extraction in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: meta-analysis. Bjs Open, 2022; 6(3): 1-12.

CHANG SC, et al. Natural orifice versus conventional mini-laparotomy for specimen extraction after reduced-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: propensity score-matched comparative study. Surgical Endoscopy, 2022; 36(1): 155-166.

COSTANTINI A, et al. Poem Versus Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy in the Treatment of Esophageal Achalasia: A Case-Control Study from Two High Volume Centers Using the Propensity Score. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2020; 24(3): 505-515.

DING Y, et al. Comparison of efficacy between natural orifice specimen extraction without abdominal incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer. J BUON, 2019; 24(5): 1817-1823.

ENTEZAMI P, et al. Transoral endoscopic parathyroidectomy vestibular approach: A systematic review. Am J Otolaryngo, 2021; 42(1): 1-5.

FENG J, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal motility disorders. Esophagus, 2020; 17(1): 11-18.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-03

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): PBPC 2024

Section

Ciências da Saúde

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Maria Clara Pereira Prado Nunes , Fabrícia Santos Silva , Luana Moura Luz Fé, Adoaldo Fernandes Gomes Neto, Isabela Castelo Guimarães, Maria Laura Vasconcelos Moreira Lopes de Goes, Arthur Pereira Miranda , João Victor Vasconcelos Tavares Maximiliano, Maria Fernanda Rodrigues Gomes, Luanar Freire Torres, Júlio César Soares Barros, Antonia Cardoso Silva

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Você tem o direito de:

  1. Compartilhar — copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial.
  2. Adaptar — remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial.
  3. O licenciante não pode revogar estes direitos desde que você respeite os termos da licença.  

 

De acordo com os termos seguintes:

  1. Atribuição — Você deve dar o crédito apropriado , prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas . Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de nenhuma maneira que sugira que o licenciante apoia você ou o seu uso.
  2. Sem restrições adicionais — Você não pode aplicar termos jurídicos ou medidas de caráter tecnológico que restrinjam legalmente outros de fazerem algo que a licença permita.