CONGENITAL SYPHILIS: CLINICAL ASPECTS AND PREVENTION IN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE — A LITERATURE REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36557/2674-9432.2026v5n6p585-596Keywords:
Congenital Syphilis, Primary Health Care, Prenatal Care, Prevention and Control, Clinical ManifestationsAbstract
Introduction: Congenital syphilis (CS) remains a serious public health problem in Brazil, resulting in miscarriages, prematurity, and developmental sequelae in children. The incidence of CS serves as a sentinel marker for the quality of prenatal care within Primary Health Care (PHC). Objective: To analyze scientific evidence regarding the clinical manifestations of congenital syphilis, as well as prevention and management strategies within the Brazilian PHC context. Methodology: This is a narrative literature review based on the PICO strategy. Searches were conducted in databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, SciELO, LILACS, and indexed journals, prioritizing publications from 2017 to 2026. The final sample consisted of a qualitative synthesis of 12 studies and technical documents. Results and Discussion: The persistence of CS in Brazil stems not from a lack of technology, but from failures in care processes. Merely expanding prenatal care coverage does not ensure a reduction in cases without adequate quality of care. Key obstacles identified include late diagnosis, institutional barriers to administering benzathine penicillin at Basic Health Units (UBS), and underreporting of severe outcomes. A critical weakness highlighted is the management of sexual partners: fewer than one-third receive appropriate therapy, thereby perpetuating the cycle of maternal reinfection. Evidence points to the need for decentralizing rapid testing, training nursing and medical professionals for the immediate administration of penicillin, and implementing localized active case-finding. Conclusion: CS is a largely preventable condition. Sustained reduction of its rates in Brazil depends on transforming the quantitative expansion of prenatal care into excellence in PHC service delivery. To achieve this, it is essential to ensure a steady supply of medical inputs, overcome administrative barriers to treatment at the UBS, improve epidemiological surveillance, and ensure a comprehensive approach to treating both partners.
Downloads
References
CHAN, E. Y. L. et al. A qualitative assessment of structural barriers to prenatal care and congenital syphilis prevention in Kern County, California. PLoS ONE, v. 16, n. 4, p. e0249419, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249419
FERNANDES, M. D. et al. The neglected role of partner treatment in congenital syphilis control in Brazil: nationwide evidence from 2007 to 2023. The Lancet Regional Health – Americas, v. 56, p. 101434, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2026.101434
FERNANDES, L. P. M. R.; SOUZA, C. L.; OLIVEIRA, M. V. Oportunidades perdidas no tratamento de parceiros sexuais de gestantes com sífilis: uma revisão sistemática. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil, v. 21, n. 2, p. 369-377, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-93042021000200002
FESTA, L. et al. Underreporting of unfavorable outcomes of congenital syphilis on the Notifiable Health Conditions Information System in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, 2007-2018. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, v. 32, n. 2, p. e2022664, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s2237-96222023000200007
FIGUEIREDO, D. C. M. M. et al. Relação entre oferta de diagnóstico e tratamento da sífilis na atenção básica sobre a incidência de sífilis gestacional e congênita. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, v. 36, n. 3, p. e00074519, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00074519
KIMBALL, A. et al. Missed Opportunities for Prevention of Congenital Syphilis — United States, 2018. MMWR – Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, v. 69, n. 22, p. 661-665, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6922a1
LANNOY, L. H. et al. Gestational and congenital syphilis across the international border in Brazil. PLoS ONE, v. 17, n. 10, p. e0275253, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275253
NKAMBA, D. et al. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of antenatal syphilis screening and treatment for the prevention of congenital syphilis in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia: results of qualitative formative research. BMC Health Services Research, v. 17, p. 556, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2494-7
PEREIRA, B. B.; SANTOS, C. P. dos; GOMES, G. C. Realização de testes rápidos de sífilis em gestantes por enfermeiros da atenção básica. Revista de Enfermagem da UFSM, v. 10, p. e82, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/2179769240034
RONCALLI, A. et al. Efeito da cobertura de testes rápidos na atenção básica sobre a sífilis em gestantes no Brasil. Revista de Saúde Pública, v. 55, p. 94, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003264
SANTOS, F. F. dos; ACOSTA, L. M. W.; SILVA, C. H. da. Sensibilidade e especificidade dos critérios epidemiológicos para definição de caso de sífilis congênita em coorte retrospectiva no Brasil. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, v. 48, p. e133, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26633/rpsp.2024.133
SOARES, M. A. S.; AQUINO, R. Associação entre as taxas de incidência de sífilis gestacional e sífilis congênita e a cobertura de pré-natal no Estado da Bahia, Brasil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, v. 37, n. 7, p. e00209520, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00209520
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kecyani Lima dos Reis, Percilia Augusta Santana da Silva Campelo, Cesar Mendel Fernandes Ferreira, Vania Maria de Araújo Giaretta, Marina Amaral, Andre Luis Ferreira Santos, Davi Romeiro Aquino

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Você tem o direito de:
- Compartilhar — copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial.
- Adaptar — remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial.
- O licenciante não pode revogar estes direitos desde que você respeite os termos da licença.
De acordo com os termos seguintes:
- Atribuição — Você deve dar o crédito apropriado , prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas . Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de nenhuma maneira que sugira que o licenciante apoia você ou o seu uso.
- Sem restrições adicionais — Você não pode aplicar termos jurídicos ou medidas de caráter tecnológico que restrinjam legalmente outros de fazerem algo que a licença permita.